![]() ![]() Meanwhile, the information for Criminal Case No. That on or about the 10th day of June 2011, in the City of Dagupan, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, JAMAL RANGAIG Y AMPUAN, SAAD MACAIRING Y LONTO, AND MICHAEL JUGUILON Y SOLIS, without authority of law, confederating together, acting jointly and helping one another, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and criminally possess dangerous drug weighing 0.18 gram, contained in two (2) plastic sachets during a party or at a social gathering or meeting, or in proximate company of at least two persons.Ĭontrary to Art. 9165 before the Regional Trial Court of Dagupan City. 9165, or the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002.įour separate Informations were filed charging Rangaig, Makairing and Juguilon with violations of Article II, Section 11 and 13 of Republic Act No. This resolves an Appeal 1 from the Court of Appeals Decision 2 which affirmed the Joint Decision 3 of the Regional Trial Court convicting Jamal Rangaig y Ampuan (Rangaig), Saad Makairing y Lonto (Makairing), and Michael Juguilon y Solis (Juguilon) of Possession of Dangerous Drugs and Possession of Dangerous Drugs during a Social Gathering, defined and penalized under Article II, Section 11 and 13, respectively, of Republic Act No. While jurisprudence and statute have created exceptions allowing warrantless arrests founded on probable cause, if a warrantless arrest is conducted outside of these exceptions, any evidence resulting therefrom will be deemed inadmissible in court. ![]() No less than the Constitution mandates that no arrest, search and seizure can be made without a valid warrant issued by a competent judicial authority. JAMAL RANGAIG Y AMPUAN, SAAD MAKAIRING Y LONTO, AND MICHAEL JUGUILON Y SOLIS, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS. ![]() PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |